saab92x.com - Over 10% of all 9-2x owners registered

Saab92x.com is dedicated to the discussion of the Saab 9-2x sport wagon, based on the Subaru WRX.
Please register or login to post.

Welcome to Saab92x.com!
9-2X Parts at Andy's

Saab92X.com is the premier Saab92X forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

#1 2011-07-28 00:43:45

DallasEJ25
Member
Registered: 2011-07-28
User Number: 5765
Posts: 8

92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

I'd like to hear from the experienced members as to how much difference there is in performance and durability from the two different Aero models in 2005 & 2006.   The turbo didn't increase much in total horsepower but it did do much better in TQ.  Just wanted to hear about how much more drivability that the 2006 had.  And issues that make one better then the other?

Thanks for the help!!

Offline

 

Remove Advertisements Advertisement

Saab92X.com

Offline

 

#2 2011-07-28 01:00:59

kirby92x
Radically Young ;D
From: Orlando, FL
Registered: 2010-08-21
User Number: 4783
Posts: 555

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

06' rarer.
better mechnically in everyway.
05' is more fun, more common and usually cheaper.

the 2.5l came for 06 which increased more then just hp/tq numbers. you can say it also increased relaibility.


2005 Saab 9-2x Aero 4EAT <3 I loves it.  1 of 1,353 same models built in 05' super duper rare. Only 17.26% of 05' Production.
Dislikes: Saab logo vanishing, paint cheap.

Offline

 

#3 2011-07-28 08:07:54

tlow98
Supporter
Supporter
From: Chicago
Registered: 2010-08-15
User Number: 4765
Posts: 4821

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero


05 MT, cold, sport...black

Offline

 

#4 2011-07-28 09:11:10

saabturbo
Sloth Wagon
Supporter
From: Nothatimportant
Registered: 2005-08-12
User Number: 697
Posts: 1185

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

Stock 06 Aero = Stage 2 4eat 05 Aero
Stock 06 Aero =  banana
Stage 2 4eat 05 Aero =  smile, sadbanana when it's hot with AC on.

In term of reliability, they are both the same.

Offline

 

#5 2011-07-28 10:32:51

tinman
Supporter
Supporter
From: Arlington, VA
Registered: 2010-10-11
User Number: 4902
Posts: 179

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

From what I've found (because I have JUST gone from my '05 to my new '06), the motor makes 3hp more (230 vs 227), but 18 more lb-ft of torque (235 vs 217).  It feels as though it relies on the turbo less and the motor a bit more.  I don't have a boost gauge in the car, but by feel alone I would assume that the 2006 runs slightly less boost and timing to keep it around the same power output.  The motor (with the additional torque sans turbo) is nicer to drive around in the day-to-day, as there's more torque lower in the revs for you to get moving and keep it smooth.  With that, when you do goose it, the sound is fantastic (it's throatier than 2.0L).  Mine has an AP Stg I on it, and that is truly a big change.  Throttle response is on a hair-trigger, and the car smoothly scoots.  You don't get that turbo surge that I've come to love in my 1.8T or the 2.0L, but that's because the motor can do more without the turbo, so there isn't the noticeable dependence on the snail.  The turbo enhances the motor, as opposed to making it.

That being said, the Stg I has already almost sold me on going Stg II, because I can tell that this engine has more and wants to go.  Make it breathe better and crank the power up even more, and this thing will be a blast and a half.


L8

Offline

 

#6 2011-07-28 10:46:02

krazykarguy
Vermontastic!
Supporter
From: Northern New England
Registered: 2007-04-06
User Number: 1944
Posts: 5947

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

aggie113 wrote:

Ignore the newbie.

Best advice in this thread yet.


2005 Aero 5MT, Cold & Premium, Cobb Stg1 93 oct, LGT 17" rims with balding Falkens, ixizhood/rshim, Hella Micro DEs, STI Axle back, JDM red hazard switch, aluminum radiator, & giant rally-style mudflaps.

Car # 20 (VIN #0060) - produced 02/04 - one of the "oldest" 9-2x's on the board!

Offline

 

#7 2011-07-28 12:30:55

saabturbo
Sloth Wagon
Supporter
From: Nothatimportant
Registered: 2005-08-12
User Number: 697
Posts: 1185

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

tinman wrote:

From what I've found (because I have JUST gone from my '05 to my new '06), the motor makes 3hp more (230 vs 227), but 18 more lb-ft of torque (235 vs 217).  It feels as though it relies on the turbo less and the motor a bit more.  I don't have a boost gauge in the car, but by feel alone I would assume that the 2006 runs slightly less boost and timing to keep it around the same power output.  The motor (with the additional torque sans turbo) is nicer to drive around in the day-to-day, as there's more torque lower in the revs for you to get moving and keep it smooth.  With that, when you do goose it, the sound is fantastic (it's throatier than 2.0L).  Mine has an AP Stg I on it, and that is truly a big change.  Throttle response is on a hair-trigger, and the car smoothly scoots.  You don't get that turbo surge that I've come to love in my 1.8T or the 2.0L, but that's because the motor can do more without the turbo, so there isn't the noticeable dependence on the snail.  The turbo enhances the motor, as opposed to making it.

That being said, the Stg I has already almost sold me on going Stg II, because I can tell that this engine has more and wants to go.  Make it breathe better and crank the power up even more, and this thing will be a blast and a half.


L8

Read up on the stage 2 tune, you have to pr3vent boost spike. Resistor pill fix or no catless DP I think.

Offline

 

#8 2011-07-28 12:35:52

DallasEJ25
Member
Registered: 2011-07-28
User Number: 5765
Posts: 8

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

@Aggie, thanks for the good information.  I had a feeling the .5L was going to help out a bit more day to day.  After doing a little reading I wanted to post a question in regards to where the "real drivers" opinions fell.  I sort of feel bad about the "Ignore the Newbie" only I think you are not referring to me...

@TLow98 thanks for the link!  I'm on it.

@SaabTurbo: I really can dig the basic symbols of what makes a engine  banana or  sadbanana
Heck bananas usually say it all...haha! 

@Tinman (either an Wiz reference or Star Trek name) Ben, A VERY cool elaborate response.  I was hoping to get a member on here to stand out like that!  Are you staying with the 5mt or slightly tempted by the 6mt trans from the WRX/STI?  I'm liking my 2.5L boxer motor only the old EJ25D is like riding a bicycle next to the 06' version in the 92x.  I'm really looking to move on...this is why I'm here.

@Krazy"loco"Karguy: what can I say?  You just didn't even try to contribute a response.  What the heck? confused oh well, there's always "one" in every board....

Offline

 

#9 2011-07-28 12:54:41

tinman
Supporter
Supporter
From: Arlington, VA
Registered: 2010-10-11
User Number: 4902
Posts: 179

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

DallasEJ25 wrote:

@Tinman (either an Wiz reference or Star Trek name) Ben, A VERY cool elaborate response.  I was hoping to get a member on here to stand out like that!  Are you staying with the 5mt or slightly tempted by the 6mt trans from the WRX/STI?  I'm liking my 2.5L boxer motor only the old EJ25D is like riding a bicycle next to the 06' version in the 92x.  I'm really looking to move on...this is why I'm here.

I'm tempted, but that's my modder at heart trying to come out.  I've spent the past years and almost doubled the car's cost with my modifications on it.  I can't DD a car running 28lb of boost in DC traffic.  And my 33yr old Vette isn't an everyday car either.  So I bought the 2005 9-2x as a DD.  Something that I could drive, enjoy, get some utility out of it, and it wouldn't be a dog.  The problem is that I fell in love with the car.  So 8 months into owning it, the 2006 appeared on the market, and I was able to sell my '05 for this '06.  I know that if I start modding, I won't be able to stop.  So we'll see how long my self-control holds off.

Honestly, if you want to know more specifics, lemme know.  I'll gladly help.  I just got the '06 off of the truck Tuesday, so I've only had it for about 48hr.  I've already put over 100mi on it and scared one of my friends, so I'm on a good path already.  I've also already purchased a bunch of things to put on it (horns, hood shocks, ssk, homelink dimming mirror, roof rails, etc), so I feel that I've already lost self-control, I'm just too stubborn to admit it yet.


L8

Offline

 

#10 2011-07-28 13:21:04

krazykarguy
Vermontastic!
Supporter
From: Northern New England
Registered: 2007-04-06
User Number: 1944
Posts: 5947

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

DallasEJ25 wrote:

@Krazy"loco"Karguy: what can I say?  You just didn't even try to contribute a response.  What the heck? confused oh well, there's always "one" in every board....

Do you really need more than has already been said? I was only reiterating that you should ignore everything kirby92x says (as the '05 and '06 are mechanically identical save for the engine, "fun" is subjective, and there is no empirical evidence to support that the 2.5L is more reliable than the 2.0L). As I said in my first reply, this is the best advice given thus far (even if it is OT).

The only thing he got right is that the '06 is rarer, and costs more (it's newer, duh). Good luck trying to find one of the 338 Aeros produced for 2006. It's referred to as a "unicorn" for a reason.

A simple site search would have returned the same thread tlow98 posted.


2005 Aero 5MT, Cold & Premium, Cobb Stg1 93 oct, LGT 17" rims with balding Falkens, ixizhood/rshim, Hella Micro DEs, STI Axle back, JDM red hazard switch, aluminum radiator, & giant rally-style mudflaps.

Car # 20 (VIN #0060) - produced 02/04 - one of the "oldest" 9-2x's on the board!

Offline

 

#11 2011-07-28 13:52:51

anti-torsion
Member
From: Broomfield CO
Registered: 2010-12-16
User Number: 5073
Posts: 136

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

I would also say there is more to "go wrong" with the 06. There is really no evidence to back up anything I'm going to say, simply my own perception.

The 06 has a more complex engine being as it has air injection (in place of a cat in the uppipe) and AVCS. Technically both should get you better spool and the AVCS should also help low end power and emissions. But, I just see it as more stuff I have to take off or worry about breaking  wink

Obviously YMMV  heart

Offline

 

#12 2011-07-28 14:11:45

saabturbo
Sloth Wagon
Supporter
From: Nothatimportant
Registered: 2005-08-12
User Number: 697
Posts: 1185

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

anti-torsion wrote:

The 06 has a more complex engine being as it has air injection (in place of a cat in the uppipe)

What !!!  confused. what's air injection ?

Offline

 

#13 2011-07-28 14:28:52

DallasEJ25
Member
Registered: 2011-07-28
User Number: 5765
Posts: 8

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

@KKG:  NOW that's what I'm talking about.  Thanks for your .02 cents. It can give me more
of a idea of what to expect between the 05-06.  It does take smarts to be sarcastic most
Of the time. Humor mixed in if much appreciated.  Unicorn, huh?  Wow, I had no
Idea that it was that rare.  I've seen a couple at the CoPart and IAA salvages totaled and that's when I started to take a closer look at them....http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee134/Rubenjc111/3E7511AE-orig.jpg

@ Anti-Tor:  The AVCS sound very cool. I like the idea of the help on the low-end torque.  Thanks for your opinion it is valuable.

Offline

 

#14 2011-07-28 15:31:06

krazykarguy
Vermontastic!
Supporter
From: Northern New England
Registered: 2007-04-06
User Number: 1944
Posts: 5947

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

I'm fairly certain that the cars you've seen at the scrappers were '05s.


2005 Aero 5MT, Cold & Premium, Cobb Stg1 93 oct, LGT 17" rims with balding Falkens, ixizhood/rshim, Hella Micro DEs, STI Axle back, JDM red hazard switch, aluminum radiator, & giant rally-style mudflaps.

Car # 20 (VIN #0060) - produced 02/04 - one of the "oldest" 9-2x's on the board!

Offline

 

#15 2011-07-28 15:51:14

tlow98
Supporter
Supporter
From: Chicago
Registered: 2010-08-15
User Number: 4765
Posts: 4821

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

Tinman fell in  heart with beater. 

banana


05 MT, cold, sport...black

Offline

 

#16 2011-07-28 16:11:53

tinman
Supporter
Supporter
From: Arlington, VA
Registered: 2010-10-11
User Number: 4902
Posts: 179

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

tlow98 wrote:

Tinman fell in  heart with beater.

can't classify it as a beater anymore.  This one is in way too nice a condition.  I'm even more inclined to care for it.  but, yep, it did me in.

L8

Offline

 

#17 2011-07-28 16:36:04

thymighty
MFWIC
Supporter
From: Indianapolis, IN
Registered: 2010-08-06
User Number: 4733
Posts: 4727

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

saabturbo wrote:

anti-torsion wrote:

The 06 has a more complex engine being as it has air injection (in place of a cat in the uppipe)

What !!!  confused. what's air injection ?

Smog air pump to prime/warm the cat.  It doesn't replace the cat.

Offline

 

#18 2011-07-29 11:00:21

anti-torsion
Member
From: Broomfield CO
Registered: 2010-12-16
User Number: 5073
Posts: 136

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

thymighty wrote:

saabturbo wrote:

anti-torsion wrote:

The 06 has a more complex engine being as it has air injection (in place of a cat in the uppipe)

What !!!  confused. what's air injection ?

Smog air pump to prime/warm the cat.  It doesn't replace the cat.

That's incorrect. In 06 they removed the cat from the uppipe and added the air injection system for cold starts.

http://www.wrxtuners.com/forums/f51/06- … ipe-15408/

Offline

 

#19 2011-07-29 11:12:42

DallasEJ25
Member
Registered: 2011-07-28
User Number: 5765
Posts: 8

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

tinman wrote:

tlow98 wrote:

Tinman fell in  heart with beater.

can't classify it as a beater anymore.  This one is in way too nice a condition.  I'm even more inclined to care for it.  but, yep, it did me in.

L8

^^^ I've got that same "Mod syndrome". My first and most important auto is my "vintage" 98' Lexus SC300 with 76k on the clock.  I buy my 99' Legacy in Denver and all the sudden I'm trying to mod the poor "beater".  Haha!!
Meanwhile, the Lex doesn't get any love (or miles).  I'm lucky that the battery didn't die in the Lex, just sitting there.

Offline

 

#20 2011-07-29 11:14:56

DallasEJ25
Member
Registered: 2011-07-28
User Number: 5765
Posts: 8

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

Tlow, that link didn't help shi......after reading it I can't think "str8"....more of a joking type of thread, no?

L8

Offline

 

#21 2011-07-29 11:21:43

DallasEJ25
Member
Registered: 2011-07-28
User Number: 5765
Posts: 8

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

krazykarguy wrote:

I'm fairly certain that the cars you've seen at the scrappers were '05s.

^Oye LocoCar,  I've sent the last 5 years walking the CoPart and IAA auctions and YES without a doubt I have see about two 06' 92x's.
But, FWIW I've seen about 20 or more 05's.  It's VERY rare indeed.  I'm always on the lookout because of it's 2.5L powerplant vs. The 2.0L heart in the 05.  I sharp on looking at the years on the Saaburu Unicorn.  It's one bad-A car.  Love the sound of the boxer and I an even bigger fan of the AWD system and the STI steering rack inside that little Scandinavian Beaut!
  diamond in the rough to say the least...

Offline

 

#22 2011-07-29 12:33:02

thymighty
MFWIC
Supporter
From: Indianapolis, IN
Registered: 2010-08-06
User Number: 4733
Posts: 4727

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

anti-torsion wrote:

thymighty wrote:

saabturbo wrote:

What !!!  confused. what's air injection ?

Smog air pump to prime/warm the cat.  It doesn't replace the cat.

That's incorrect. In 06 they removed the cat from the uppipe and added the air injection system for cold starts.

http://www.wrxtuners.com/forums/f51/06- … ipe-15408/

Ahh, I see what you're saying.  2002-2005 has three cats:
http://www.subaruforester.org/vbulletin/attachments/f87/19931d1255561271-where-cat-locations-wrx-intake-exhaust-diagram.jpg

in 2006 it becomes two cats:
http://www.wrxtuners.com/forums/attachments/f51/3386d1213366512-downpipes-turboback-exhausts-wrx06.jpg

could be worse I guess:
http://myfunnypics.org/d/98-2/Five+cats+surround+one+cat.jpg

Offline

 

#23 2011-07-29 19:00:43

saabturbo
Sloth Wagon
Supporter
From: Nothatimportant
Registered: 2005-08-12
User Number: 697
Posts: 1185

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

anti-torsion wrote:

thymighty wrote:

saabturbo wrote:


What !!!  confused. what's air injection ?

Smog air pump to prime/warm the cat.  It doesn't replace the cat.

That's incorrect. In 06 they removed the cat from the uppipe and added the air injection system for cold starts.

http://www.wrxtuners.com/forums/f51/06- … ipe-15408/

Without a cat in uppipe I know, but where's the air injection system.

Offline

 

#24 2011-08-04 12:03:02

DallasEJ25
Member
Registered: 2011-07-28
User Number: 5765
Posts: 8

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

Another question here.

In the EJ25 series of engines that were offered in the 92x.  The 05' Linear had a NA 2.5L SOHC that was called the EJ253.

What was the 2005 2.0L DOHC turbocharged EJ called?

And the 2006 DOHC 2.5L Turbo name specific?   Even the Wiki gets shady when it comes to just the right identification of these variations of the EJ25 phase II boxer.   Can someone assist?

Then the vv

Offline

 

#25 2011-08-04 12:11:25

crxgator
Bronicorn
Supporter
From: Kingston, NY
Registered: 2009-04-06
User Number: 3626
Posts: 1356

Re: 92X Aero 2005 vs the 2006 Aero

EJ205 - USDM 2.0L turbo
EJ255 - USDM 2.5L turbo non-STi


05 Aero - SOLD
06 Aero - 5 speed - In my thoughts sad
04 FXT - 5 speed - Rapid lesbian dildo machine (current)

Offline

 
AutoAnything
AutoAnything
AutoAnything
AutoAnything
AutoAnything
AutoAnything

Board footer

Site problems, bugs, or questions? Contact Administrator
All content copyright Saab92x.com 2005-2010
SAAB and the SAAB logos are trademarks of Saab Cars USA, Inc.