![]() |
|
|
|
Welcome to Saab92x.com!
|
lizzardo wrote:
Ben wrote:
Very nice.
Oh, and 4:20.I honestly didn't even notice that until I was resizing pics for upload to the image host.
I'm not sure if they all have a strut tower brace, but when I popped the hood, the salesman said he'd never noticed one of those before. He's not motorsport-inclined though, so he may have seen many and never noticed. It's painted steel, but they must have felt it helped or they wouldn't have spent the money without pointing it out.
It still looks very similar to the 2.4l in the 850 in my driveway. The amount of plastic on the C30 seems like nothing compared to oh, say, a GTI.
Thanks for breaking down the parts content Lizzardo. I'm glad to see not much has changed under the new ownership. I don't think production will cease in Europe, but I do think Chinese parts content is inevitable.
Offline
Offline
Wow! Congrats, keep both cars!! 
Offline
Looks good man, best of luck with it, congratulations.
Offline
anaya661 wrote:
Wow! Congrats, keep both cars!!
I wish I could. I've grown rather fond of it. Sadly, finances come into play in their usual buzzkill fashion.
Offline
thymighty wrote:
It still looks very similar to the 2.4l in the 850 in my driveway. The amount of plastic on the C30 seems like nothing compared to oh, say, a GTI.
Thanks for breaking down the parts content Lizzardo. I'm glad to see not much has changed under the new ownership. I don't think production will cease in Europe, but I do think Chinese parts content is inevitable.
It was all from the window sticker. I don't know when they added that information. I don't think my Linear's had it. I'll look later when I get out the Linear Files.
All that plastic is kind of a bummer, since I really like machinery. It serves two purposes though:
1) Managing airflow is critical for cooling, especially on turbocharged engines. Even the battery has a cover with a cooling duct to it.
2) It's cheaper to mold a plastic part than it is to put a decent finish on metal. When they doesn't show, rough castings are good enough.
Offline
I wouldn't be surprised if the engine covers served a 3rd function: reducing underhood NVH.
Subbed for more pics and info. Nice purchase! Please do a comprehensive road test/ review.
Oh, and there's no way that has too much power for fwd. I've had more power and lots more tq in the gti than that, and i still need moar. Admittedly, it's tough to get used to a torquey fwd car after the flypaper-like grip of awd, but you'll quickly acclimate and learn to love the way a 2wd car puts more power to the ground at higher speeds without all that drivetrain loss. You'll also learn to trust the amazing surefootedness modern stability/ traction control programs impart in rainy and snowy weather.
Offline
Bunnspeed wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if the engine covers served a 3rd function: reducing underhood NVH.
Subbed for more pics and info. Nice purchase! Please do a comprehensive road test/ review.
Oh, and there's no way that has too much power for fwd. I've had more power and lots more tq in the gti than that, and i still need moar. Admittedly, it's tough to get used to a torquey fwd car after the flypaper-like grip of awd, but you'll quickly acclimate and learn to love the way a 2wd car puts more power to the ground at higher speeds without all that drivetrain loss. You'll also learn to trust the amazing surefootedness modern stability/ traction control programs impart in rainy and snowy weather.
You're talking to someone who had to make the opposite transition going *to* FWD. My old 99 Turbo has wicked torque steer and lights up the tires too easily. I think this would be a handful without the electronic training wheels, and I'm still not happy that they're necessary.
I talk about too much power the same way I do with my bike; however, the car only has power to the point of silliness, the bike has power to the point of being stupid. And I love it.
EDIT: The DTSC (Dynamic Traction Stability Control) will likely take some getting used to. In places where the trusty Linear can be put in deep, hard on the brakes, transitioning to full power, the C30R squirms and does a little dance. I'm not sure how long it will be before I upgrade the struts/shocks. They're just not as good at controlling the car as the Linear's D-Specs. To be fair, the Linear has had a lot of fiddling to get to this point, and I have a *very* good idea of what it'll do in any situation without even thinking about it. The starting point on this car is higher, so I have high hopes once I get it dialed.
The power ... because of the continuously variable valve timing, the power comes in very low, and in a right-now kind of way. The old 99's turbo lag gives a little time to get ready.
Because I've been busy since I got it, I still don't have many miles. I do; however, have a reading from the trip computer. I think I need more open road.
Last edited by lizzardo (2012-04-28 21:02:00)
Offline
My only visual Issue, as I have with so many newer cars, is the George Forman grille fog light surround plastic. In so many cars it isnt a real open grille. I'd love an open honeycomb! Which is something for me to say being the trypophobe that I am 
Last edited by anaya661 (2012-04-29 02:55:03)
Offline
anaya661 wrote:
My only visual Issue, as I have with so many newer cars, is the George Forman grille fog light surround plastic. In so many cars it isnt a real open grille. I'd love an open honeycomb! Which is something for me to say being the trypophobe that I am
I'm not a big fan of fake vents either. I'm still getting a feel for common mods on this car though, so perhaps there is something to be done. A trim piece without the functionless style? One with functional venting? I dunno. Most likely, I'll let that part be and fiddle elsewhere.
Offline
Just posted this on the C30 forum in the "top 5 likes and dislikes for new owners" thread.
----------------------------
After less than a week, I've got a list together:
Like:
1) Power - it comes in at an unbelievably low rpm for a 2.5l engine, and there is hardly any turbo lag
2) Comfort - the miscellaneous comfort/luxury bits are nice. Keyless entry, climate control, steering wheel controls, etc. Not necessary, but nice.
3) Styling - no surprise. I bought the damn thing in the first place, after all.
4) Steering ratio - the quicker steering ratio means I can keep my hands in proper position through tighter turns, although it does require a little more precision on the freeway
5) USB port on sound system - it's nice to put some songs on a flash drive for whatever suits my mood.
Dislike:
1) Pedal spacing - heel/toe just isn't that easy. The accelerator needs to extend farther down and the brake pedal needs to be closer to it
2) Pedal feel - they're too soft. I'm accustomed to more pedal effort. I'm getting used to the clutch, but the brake pedal should be more firm
3) Suspension - while much better than the standard model, the R-Design still needs work. I should be able to come into a corner hot, brake hard, transition to cornering, and get on the gas. I can do that, but the car squirms around with a vague feeling, and the DTSC light starts flashing at me. The damping isn't right, and there's too much body roll, particularly in the front. I guess I've spoiled myself with the suspension I put together on my last car, and have purchased a luxury/sport coupe, not a sports car. Oh, well, I like to tinker, and this gives me something to do.
4) Speaking of brakes, just braking hard with a little turning makes the car squirm. There's too much initial bite, so they're not as progressive as I'd like, but a pad change will likely cure that.
5) Not enough lateral support on the seats
6) General visibility - it's adequate, but that's it. The dash is high and the view to the rear isn't particulary good
7) I had to pay extra for a cargo cover? Seriously?
8) Rear armrest doesn't fold up - minor, but it's more of a complaint about stupid Americans and their lawyers than anything else
9) Center display - it both shows smudges and reflects a lot. Not always easy to see.
Offline
Thanks for the update. How is it in terms of isolation, quietness (wind, road, & engine noise), and ride quality for long distance highway driving at elevated speeds?
Offline
lizzardo wrote:
thymighty wrote:
It still looks very similar to the 2.4l in the 850 in my driveway. The amount of plastic on the C30 seems like nothing compared to oh, say, a GTI.
Thanks for breaking down the parts content Lizzardo. I'm glad to see not much has changed under the new ownership. I don't think production will cease in Europe, but I do think Chinese parts content is inevitable.It was all from the window sticker. I don't know when they added that information. I don't think my Linear's had it. I'll look later when I get out the Linear Files.
All that plastic is kind of a bummer, since I really like machinery. It serves two purposes though:
1) Managing airflow is critical for cooling, especially on turbocharged engines. Even the battery has a cover with a cooling duct to it.
2) It's cheaper to mold a plastic part than it is to put a decent finish on metal. When they doesn't show, rough castings are good enough.
I believe the parts composition sticker is a somewhat recent development. I first noticed it in on a new Nissan Altima in 2010, just before I bought my 9-2x.
The battery cooling duct has been present on every Volvo I've owned. The 850 also gets a cooling duct from the grille to the large plastic box housing the various ECMs it has.
Offline
Bunnspeed wrote:
Thanks for the update. How is it in terms of isolation, quietness (wind, road, & engine noise), and ride quality for long distance highway driving at elevated speeds?
All that stuff: It's great. I'm not sure your definition of "elevated" but traffic moves along pretty quickly on the freeway here. The left lane is typically moving at 75+. It's loafing along in 6th at that speed. I think it'd roll along comfortably, both for the engine and the occupants, at 95 without feeling busy at all.
Very quiet in all respects (except the dash vents when the fan is on high) with very good ride quality. I'm thinking Bilsteins will keep the ride quality and sharpen handling, but haven't researched it.
Offline
Sounds like a great car. I'd pass on the Bilsteins though. I had a set on my 2008 GTI and they were uncomfortably stiff. They snubbed out bumps excessively quickly and made the ride feel brutal as a result. I finally had to change them out because the ride drove me nuts.
Your best bet will probably be adjustable Koni Sports, assuming they are available for your car, but I'd try a mild rear swaybar upgrade before doing anything else, as this is going to create a dramatic improvement in the car's handling with less of an impact on ride quality than any other suspension upgrades. My 92x was super floaty and unstable on the highway when new, and it would move around and squirm under braking like your Volvo. My first suspension upgrade was the FHI 20 mm rsb and that basically solved those issues. Granted it didn't turn that car into a track star, but for road use it made the car far more sporty yet stable, both in a turn and in a straight line at high speed cruise.
Offline
Bunnspeed wrote:
Sounds like a great car. I'd pass on the Bilsteins though. I had a set on my 2008 GTI and they were uncomfortably stiff. They snubbed out bumps excessively quickly and made the ride feel brutal as a result. I finally had to change them out because the ride drove me nuts.
Your best bet will probably be adjustable Koni Sports, assuming they are available for your car, but I'd try a mild rear swaybar upgrade before doing anything else, as this is going to create a dramatic improvement in the car's handling with less of an impact on ride quality than any other suspension upgrades. My 92x was super floaty and unstable on the highway when new, and it would move around and squirm under braking like your Volvo. My first suspension upgrade was the FHI 20 mm rsb and that basically solved those issues. Granted it didn't turn that car into a track star, but for road use it made the car far more sporty yet stable, both in a turn and in a straight line at high speed cruise.
The Bilsteins come in multiple grades. Do you know which ones your GTI had? My old 99 Turbo came with them from the factory and I didn't have that complaint. The current line looks to have HD ans SP, with the SP's decscription sounding like your experience.
The first mods I did to the 9-2X were the upgrading the transmission mount and the pitching stopper to GroupN units. I can't remember if the short shifter and bushings or the 20mm sway bar came next. The IPD/Rallitek front sway bar came shortly after the rear. Next was the Pink wagon springs. All that helped quite a bit, but things didn't get *really* settled until I replaced the stock dampers with the Tokico D-Specs and got them dialed. Track star? No, but able to reach the point that to go much faster I'd need a racing seat and harness. Muscles are not the right way to keep the driver in position while cornering.
Anyway, back to suspension: I think the front feels like the limiting factor here, at least for the transitional response, although the damping is also a bit low. The car rebounds too much after a bump, and it could also use a bit more compression damping, but it needs to be *quality* damping. It feels OK on high-speed compression damping ,but needs more low-speed.
Sadly, this car doesn't have better lateral support in the seats than the Linear. Oh, well. The engine is turning out to be quite entertaining, and the shifter, while a bit long compared to my Kartboy-equipped Linear, had a satisfying, precise feel.
Offline
Bunnspeed wrote:
Off topic for a sec: Lizzardo, I see you have a C30 with the Polestar tune. How do you like it, tuned? I was just sitting in a C30 a few hours ago at a car expo and talking about Polestar. What kind of power does it make with just a reflash?
Sorry to threadjack
Replying here to negate the threadjack. I think it's
better this way.
The standard power/torque is 227/236, with the torque curve being pancake flat from 1500-5000rpm. The do that to minimize torque steer. They control boost, ignition, and cam timing to get that flatness. The cam timing is apparently continuously variable, rather than a simpler two-stage system. The Polestar tune ups that to 250/273 and loses the artificial flatness for a more conventional looking torque curve.
The Polestar tune is more expensive that than some other tunes and not as aggressive, but preserves the warranty. Since I ordered the car that way, I don't have a back-to-back comparison, but people on the C30 forum that have upgraded after owning the car for some time are quite pleased with the difference.
I'll follow this up with information about my mods so far. I waited about as long with this car as I did with my Linear. That is, I started almost immediately.
Offline
Thanks for the update. I forgot about this thread, otherwise I wouldn't have shat up the other one. But good call 'relocating' that discussion to over here.
I noticed that I never responded to your question about the Bilsteins. I had the MKV Bilstein Sports (B8's, I think they are called now). Pretty much everyone in the VW community who knows about suspension tuning now agrees that those were over-damped and rode poorly as a result. Supposedly Bilstein addressed the issue with the MK6 versions of the B8, which also fit the MKV. People have had wonderful things to say about how the MK6 dampers work on the MKV, as they have been re-designed to have a lusciously compliant, yet controlled ride. I also test drove a 2003 Mustang Cobra convertible over the summer (came super close to trading-in my GTI for it, in fact) and was astounded by the fact that it rode like a dream. Probably the best ride of any vehicle I've been in recently, including my Deville. It had factory Bilsteins, too.
Definitely do your research before purchasing Bils as they obviously can be hit or miss depending on the application.
Any thoughts about going Stage 2 on your car?
Offline
Bilstein's are probably the highest quality standard shock available, if you select wisely. Any "Sport" model s intended for aftermarket "tuner" springs, and typically are slightly shorter than their HD series. As such, they are typically over damped for factory stock springs. HDs are usually well matched to stock springs. I have Bilstein Sports on my Eibach ProKit equipped Audi //S6, it's a pretty close match (very slightly under damped in the rear, but there is a reasonable cost option of customer selected custom damping for Bilstein's, and the wait is apparently not long. The thing is, Bilstein's tend to last so long, I may never get the chance to try the option. My previous Audi 200q had Bilstein Sports and H&R Sports and my friend had an A4 with a Bilstein Coilover kit, and the damping was just about spot on.
Offline
Here's the list of mods:
- Debadged rear
- Elevate rear sway bar.
- All-season (rubber) mats all around. Sunglasses holder on driver's side. Load bars with locks (will only put them on as needed)
- Door sill protectors
- Engine skid plate. The stock one is just a plastic shield, mostly for airflow. The oil pan is cast aluminum and apparently can't take a hit very well.
- Bilstein HD struts/shocks. I thought about thsi one a while. I needed something better than stock and went with these over the Koni FSD, partly from personal prejudice. Bilsteins were standard on the old Saab Turbos, and I've seen Konis wear out sooner than I thought they should.
- Hardwired Valentine 1. I connected it to the plug that would be connected to the autodimming mirror if I had one.
- Elevate Intercooler with matching intake and intercooler hard pipes with silicone hoses, and Elevate upper intake manifold
- Insulation on inside of roof panel
The car had some quirks when new. It turned out that the shipping spacers were left in when they PDId the car. That made the nose high and made the handling a little more "interesting" than it ought to have been. It certainly accounted for what seems an overly aggressive stability control system.
Now, the quirk that needs fixing is the clutch. If I rev to over 5500 before shifting, the engagement points moves up from the floor. If I rev to the limit (6500) and shift quickly, the clutch takes a moment to engage after releasing the pedal. It feels llike the release mechanism is sticking. I bring it in tomorrow. They've ordered up everything possible so they'll have it on hand once they do the tardown. Volvo is interested in the problem since it's not one they've heard of.
In other news, the car is no longer in production. The 2013 model is the last. It was the tenth worst selling car in the US in 2012. It's been out for a while, so rumors of replacements are, of course, heating up. A competitor to the Mini seems most credible.
Offline
would def like to hearing about your mods, lizard. 
Last edited by tlow98 (2013-01-20 14:58:15)
Offline
Bunnspeed wrote:
Definitely do your research before purchasing Bils as they obviously can be hit or miss depending on the application.
Scargo wrote:
Bilstein's are probably the highest quality standard shock available, if you select wisely. Any "Sport" model s intended for aftermarket "tuner" springs, and typically are slightly shorter than their HD series. As such, they are typically over damped for factory stock springs. HDs are usually well matched to stock springs.
I did a fair bit of research. Bilsteins use an internal, hydraulic bump stop. The Standard and HD models can cause trouble on cars that have been lowered significantly. They hit the bump stop too easily: The Sport models have a shortened mechanism to account for this. I went with the HD, because even though the R-Design is a little lower than the standard C30, it's not a lot. The gas pressure in the shocks/struts did raise the car slightly, but I'm used to that now. I can clear the wheel stops in parking garages, so don't need to worry about cracking any plastic there.
The ride: Small, square bumps, such as freeway expansion joints, are definitely more noticeable. Some stretches of road are not as comfortable as stock. Larger bumps are absorbed dramatically better though. The net gain is significant. The stockers were close in damping, but slightly soft on rebound in the front. The harshness on small stuff seems to have diminished as I've got some miles on the dampers. They felt like they had some "stiction" that needed breaking in. Then again, maybe I've gotten used to it.
Bunnspeed wrote:
Any thoughts about going Stage 2 on your car?
Check the intake mods: everything from the MAF to the throttle body, plus the upper manifold (it's two pieces). The bigger intercooler definitely helped in the summer. Not so much on the first acceleration, but multiple accelerations in succession got softer. The new one is more efficient and less prone to heating up like that. The rest is designed to help response and midrange. I have been considering a muffler, just to get a little more auditory feedback, but don't want to end up with drone on the freeway. The next thing up in the power realm is the downpipe, but that means a new tune. The rest is all good with the Polestar tune. Not sure I want to make that jump for a while, although it does give a significant boost in power. The CBE is supposedly good for a few HP though.
I haven't tracked it yet. I'm sure I'll feel the extra weight over the Linear, and the extra power will screw up all my markers. The weight and power will also surely take their toll on the brakes. I'm worried about the Emergency Brake Assist feature. It can't be turned off. It's designed to detect emergency braking actions and speed up the point of maximum braking. I think it holds it there a bit too. It turns out that many people let off on the brake when they realize impact is unavoidable. The Linear's upgraded brakes and low power meant I could go from full throttle to maximum braking very quickly and predictably. I think I caused some in the HPDE sessions to overcook a corner or two, waiting for me to brake.
Offline
you're correct on the Bilstein construction (the opposite is also true, I knew of a stock car where someone fitted Sports, and the car topped out and ruined a pair of shocks. Was fixed with a set of HDs. And your observations on the ride pretty well mirrors my observations, although I do get a tiny bit of rear float in really high speed stuff...if I did it again, I'd custom order the rear rebound to be between 5 - 10% higher, although you can send them the spring rate and corner weights and they'd custom valve it for me based upon that instead.
Offline
Tribbe wrote:
My cousin have a c30 with the T5 engine he is very tempted to get the polestar tune to maintain the warranty.
He don't have the R-design but the same engine specs as a R.
That's an older car (pre-facelift, as the Volvo guys seem to call it). How much warranty is left?
But yes, the Polestar tune is nice. They refer to it as "optimized" and it does need to be fed premium fuel. For me, that's 91. I can drive for half an hour (minimum) to get 93, but it's not worth it.
There is only one version of the T5 for the C30 because the R-Design isn't an R, at least not the way Volvo used to use the R designation. It's a stylistic change to go with some suspension upgrades.
Offline
|
|